The 16-megapixel selfie camera does a really poor job with my skin tone, turning it into a pinkish, lighter tone, and it seems to aggressively smooth out my skin. I don't have last year's Moto G Stylus to compare it directly, but some of the pictures I took with that model certainly look nicer than most of the shots from the 2022 model. Juggle too many apps at once and it can stutter a lot. There are instances where things can get frustrating certain dense webpages, like one I use for work, are really slow. (Demanding titles like Genshin Impact are very choppy and look low-res, as expected for a cheap phone.) I've been able to tweet from it, send messages, respond to emails, and even play games like Dead Cells. The good news is that performance on this phone is … fine. Two years on from the start of the pandemic and we're seeing the ripple effects of the initial disruption.

It’s also important for us to consider the supply outlook and diversify our portfolio to meet demand.” Why is Motorola using worse-performing chips in its new phones? The chip shortage and global supply chain issues are the likely culprit, which is also what I gleaned from this somewhat vague statement a Motorola spokesperson sent my way: “As part of our product development process, we consider various technologies and all available components in the industry to create the best products and experiences for consumers. It was a similar but worse story when I tested the Moto G Power 2022 a few months ago-it uses an even lesser chip that feels cripplingly slow compared to its predecessor. But the Helio G88 just doesn't stack up as well to the Qualcomm chip Motorola used in last year's Moto G Stylus. That's fine-phones like the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G use a MediaTek chip with pretty good performance. Motorola's new $300 phone uses a MediaTek Helio G88 processor with 6 gigabytes of RAM instead of the usual Qualcomm Snapdragon.

Moto g stylus google pay